Prieto, Alberto

Loading...
Profile Picture
Institutional profile
lberto Prieto began to study the ancient world at the age of 10, continued those studies during his secondary education, and pursued university degrees in all three branches of classical scholarship. After participating in an excavation field-school at Cetamura del Chianti in Tuscany, he served as a trench director for three summers at the Lydian capital Sardis in modern Turkey and excavated on the Palatine hill in Rome. For his doctorate, Prof. Prieto participated in pioneering multidisciplinary archaeological fieldwork in Magna Graecia, at Metaponto in Basilicata, and Crotone in Calabria, where he directed intensive field surveys and developed professional interests in Greek and Roman history, archaeological theory and methods, Mediterranean geoarchaeology and landscape history, history of agriculture and technology, digital imaging, and geospatial technologies. In 2007 he moved to Rome to pursue a professional degree in film-making with a specialization in cinematography, teach courses in the archaeology, history, and topography of Rome and the Roman world, supervise excavation field schools, and produce educational videos about Roman civilization and conservation of cultural heritage.

Publication Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Publication
    Aedicula Tombs and Statues in Rome: Reconsidering the Monument of Eurysaces
    (Archaeological Institute of America, 2023) Corrado, Crispin; Prieto, Alberto; Goldman, Max L.
    This article revisits the well-known monument of Eurysaces in the context of the Roman funerary landscape. By focusing on its structure and original context, our research demonstrates that the monument, far from being a unicum, instead conformed to contemporary commemorative practices and was in many ways typical. Analysis of comparable monuments and funerary areas, as well as characterization of the concrete used, indicates that the monument of Eurysaces was originally an aedicula tomb with a superstructure, now missing. This reconstruction allows for a more convincing and traditional positioning of the relief images known as “Eurysaces and his wife” at the crowning level of this structure. While our research focuses on the monument of Eurysaces, an important and unexpected result has been the likely identification of several full-length portrait reliefs whose distinctive features suggest that they belong to a previously unrecognized corpus in Rome: aedicular statues. This designation explains the characteristics differentiating them from freestanding statues and helps fill the lacuna of evidence for Rome’s once robust group of funerary structures and ornamentation. The identification of these aedicular statues, in turn, reiterates the fact that aedicula tombs were once popular in the city’s funerary landscape, as they were across the Roman empire.